Wikipedia

Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise season 4

(Redirected from Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4))
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleStar Trek: Enterprise season 4 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starStar Trek: Enterprise season 4 is the main article in the Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2014Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 13, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the final episode of the fourth season of Star Trek: Enterprise ended eighteen years of Star Trek on television?
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago15 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 18:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

Episode arcs

  • The list article that Suliban points to doesn't include any reference to the race. I'm wondering whether it's worth restoring the Suliban article, a redirect since 2011, as they were such a significant part of the series?
  • Most of the Star Trek alien races were merged into the lists - and not particularly well either. It's something that can certainly be expanded on, as it's just been raised at the project as someone else pointed out that it also applied to Hirogen. Miyagawa (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Seeing that Orion slave girl also leads nowhere. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Yeah, looks like I might have some work on my hands there! Time to give some of those a bit of an overhaul (or at least install some heavily cited start type articles). Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

More comments later. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Passing "Cancellation", I forgot about the proto-Kickstarter campaign. Passing "Production", "Ratings", "Accolades", "See also", "Notes". -- Zanimum (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Passing infobox, Images, lead, production (I've never heard of Shatnerverse. Interesting.), and reviews.

These Are The Voyages...

The pictures look like TNG karaoke! Nothing against these images, but we to start getting Wikimedia partnerships with conventions, to get new images. Also, I love the sprinter/bus quote.
  • inconsistent capitalization of Holodeck/holodeck
    Fixed to the lowercase holodeck. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Passing "Cast".

Episodes

  • Why is Surak Fed in superscript? They appear to point to non-existent footnotes.
  • That's from the main episode list to denote episode arcs. I don't think they're necessary and have removed them. I'm aiming to get the main episode list up to FL quality - but I just need to work through it to get the tables to the same state that season four is in. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm not sure you need to overlink Archer in the episode list.
  • I've trimmed the linking down in the episode list quite a fair bit. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Home media release

  • What's the order of languages? Is that how they are on the DVD packaging? There's not alphabetical, nor are they English first.

References

When I save the page, it reveals "Hidden categories". One of them is for the subscription content, but the other is "Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL". I honestly don't know which reference it's talking about.
  • I've gone through them all and can't find a cite without a URL (apart from the one without an accessdate either as it was a newspaper report from 1969). Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • 15/16: Twitter, from what I've been told in my own GANs, isn't acceptable by itself. When Braga tweeted clarification about Future Guy, did any website report on it? Keep the actual tweets, but also cite the coverage of the identification.
  • I've added an extra cite to show independent coverage of the tweets. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • 70/71: Amazon is italicized once, not italicized the other time.
  • Fixed - it was listed as "work" in one cite and "publisher" in another. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Passing "External links". -- Zanimum (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be everything. Pass! -- Zanimum (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Colour contrast problems edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.

To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.

To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.

Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Star Trek: Enterprise (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Star_Trek:_Enterprise_season_4&oldid=1216321285"