Talk:StarHub

Latest comment: 5 years ago by BenAveling in topic Lede

Untitled

edit

I removed the table showing the prices of StarHub's various options, under the guidelines at WP:NOT#DIR: "prices of a product should not be quoted in an article unless the price can be sourced and there is a justified reason for its mention. Examples of justified reasons include notable sales of rare collectors items, prices relating to discussion of a price war, and historical discussion of economic inflation. On the other hand, street prices are trivia that can vary widely from place to place and over time. Therefore, lists of products currently on sale should not quote street prices." If anyone objects to this edit and wishes to add the information back, please discuss it here. Terraxos 14:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on StarHub. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Logo?

edit

Is that still the current logo - or should we be using the white on green version? Ben Aveling 03:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

That is still the current logo, but nowadays, it's in light green. Let's ask other contributors for consensus. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lede

edit

The introduction really should be a short paragraph on who StarHub is, not just the single sentence that's currently there. Ben Aveling 03:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply