Talk:Soviet destroyer Skory (1939)

Soviet destroyer Skory (1939) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 14, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Skory (1939)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Taking a look. —Ed!^(talk) 03:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

It is reasonably well written:
Dab links, dup links and external links all show no problems. Copyvio tool returns green.
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass Offline references accepted in good faith. Cursory check of Google Books shows references that back up source material here.
It is broad in its coverage:
- Unit cost preferred as always though especially in this case I imagine it's not possible to include.
- Any commander would also be preferred though that too doesn't seem to be par for Soviet records.
- Any idea whose mine sunk her? This, too though isn't something likely to be found easily if there wasn't an immediate answer.
- Suspect Andrey Zhdanov should be a redlink here but don't have the benefit of local expertise on that.
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
Pass Multiple references given an appropriate balance between them.
It is stable:
Pass No problems there.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
Pass One image tagged PD where appropriate.
Other:
Pass Don't see any issues sufficient to hold the article for GA at this point, it's appropriately filled out given the very short history of the ship. Well done! —Ed!^(talk) 04:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic