Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Makarov (1970)

Soviet cruiser Admiral Makarov (1970) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 7, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Makarov (1970)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

will start in the next coule of days. auntieruth (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

lead is confusing. She was decommissioned because she was deteriorating, and the navy didn't have funding to repair her, right? That sentence needs clarity.

Done. Kges1901 (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

explain why class is different Nato to soviet

Done by linking to NATO reporting name. Kges1901 (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

paragraph on aerial threat. Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings to protect against aerial threats.

Done. Kges1901 (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

. An engine room fire sparked by a lighted cigarette thrown into a ventilation shaft by a sailor was extinguished in three hours by emergency parties on 20 February 1988. how about On 20 February 1988, a sailor tossed a lighted cigarette into a ventilation shaft, causing an engine fire; emergency parties extinguished the fire in three hours, but the engine room....

Done, unfortunately the source did not specify how much damage. Kges1901 (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Add topic