This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
In these edits I removed fluffy content from the lead. "Cult classic" is an overused fluffy term. Virtually everything has a cult following because everything is liked by somebody. There were also repetitive and subjective statements about "hit" and "trend setting" that only serve the promote the subject. The statement that critics and the subject considered Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! as his best work to date, might be true, but it's unsourced.
Then here I had to get rid of more of the fluffy garbage from the article. Does someone really think that "huge box office hit" is appropriate tone for a neutrally-worded, objective encyclopedia? Or that we should be describing films as "blockbusters", a subjective term that has no specific academic value? C'mon. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Update: Looks like that last nonsense was added years ago in 2007. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
