Talk:Somalia at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics
Somalia at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Somalia at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This looks fine except for one issue, the shortness of the article—or, as far as GAs go, the extreme shortness.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Compared to, say, Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, this (a) has no image (b) describes the events in very little detail, giving an end result only (c) says little outside the very events. How was the athletes chosen? How did the athletes react on the performances, how did others react? I realize that the media coverage of Sierra Leone probably is scarce, but to have nothing is not appropriate either, for the GA level.
Re: point b, "without going into unnecessary detail", this should go into more detail..
- Compared to, say, Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, this (a) has no image (b) describes the events in very little detail, giving an end result only (c) says little outside the very events. How was the athletes chosen? How did the athletes react on the performances, how did others react? I realize that the media coverage of Sierra Leone probably is scarce, but to have nothing is not appropriate either, for the GA level.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Is this impossible to illustrate?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- for now. Geschichte (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing has happened, so this fails. Feel free to try again with a reassessment, but the above points should be seen to first. Geschichte (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Somalia at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100826005915/http://www.singapore2010.sg:80/public/sg2010/en/en_games/en_games_results.html to http://www.singapore2010.sg/public/sg2010/en/en_games/en_games_results.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)