Talk:Sir James Reid, 1st Baronet

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 58.166.218.198 in topic the royal doctor [sic]

the royal doctor [sic]

edit

This section needs some more cites in the first 3 paragraphs, particularly in reference to Wale's alleged diagnosis of gonorrhea and Reid's supposed secret diplomacy with the Kaiser. In addition, it needs to be rewritten - for example the first paragraph mentions the diagnosis, then jumps to the Munshi for no apparent reason. The third paragraph seems to be written by a non-native English speaker.--Marjaliisa (talk) 04:53, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Autochthony writes. An interesting subject, but - like Marjaliisa, above - I found the text hard to follow, and possibly not in clear chronological order. I know nothing of this chap, and little indeed of his grandson Richard Ingrams, so will not undertake this clarification myself, but do suggest that improvements could be made. Not least, as Marjaliisa had urged, to citation. Autochthony wrote. 2140 Z 20171004 86.179.75.251 (talk) 21:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

            Very badly written. Some sentences make no sense at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.218.198 (talk) 22:28, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply