Talk:Simon Marius

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 25 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cervidae1331!.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

This led to a dispute with Galileo, who accused Marius, not only of being a liar, but also of having copied his own work so that his Mundus Iovialis was nothing but plagiarism.

Is there a source for this? Galileo disputed the claim vigorously and pointed out that Mayr's only reported observation as early as Galileo's was one that was represented by Galileo's previously published diagram for the same night; but the "nothing-but" plagiarism sounds more like the dispute 10 years earlier about the military compass, in which Mayr was involved only indirectly. Lacking positive data, I'm toning down the accusation a trifle, while explaining its substance. --Dandrake 00:01, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Change to Andromeda

I changed Andromeda Galaxy to Andromeada "nebulae" for two reasons:

1. Before it was discoverd to be a galaxy it was thought to be a nebulae
2. Ed Hubble discoved that it was a galaxy. By saying that "he claimed to discover Andromeda galaxy first" is like saying that "he claimed that he discovred to discover that it was a galaxy before Hubble". How could he argue his discover with Hubble when they live 300 years apart?

Good point, but it should be "nebula" not nebulae, which is plural. No claim that Andromeda is other than a single. Tham153 (talk) 22:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Andromeda

when galiloe saw the first star in his life he had a heart attak The Andromeda Galaxy is visible to the unaided eye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.55.83 (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC) Al-Sufi was a Persian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.82.116.135 (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ruling in 2003, results published in 1907?

The article states:

"But a jury in The Netherlands in 2003 examined the evidence extensively and ruled in favor of Marius's independent discoveries, with results published by Bosscha in 1907."

At least one of these dates must be wrong.

Karl gregory jones (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Simon Marius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050924113849/http://simon-marius.de/ to http://www.simon-marius.de/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)