This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is true the phrase is used in the title of a modern article about Sveaborg, but it is a-historic to suggest that it held that reputation at that time. In fact the origin of the term is in it's negation. I forget who it was at the time of it's heyday, but the sentiment was precisely that Sveaborg was not the Gibraltar of the North, rather than that it was. I'll try to dig up the full quote with context, but is there something that can be done in the meantime? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC) (EDIT: apparently I was mistaken, the phrase was indeed used of it. As you were.) -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
