Talk:Shoeburyness railway station

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Through-station layout? edit

Quote: The station is arranged in a through station layout despite acting as a terminal station.

What does that mean? The image in the infobox shows two trains standing at buffer stops at the platform ends. That looks like a pretty conventional kind of terminus layout to me. -- Picapica 21:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Through trains onto District Line edit

The box at the end suggest that the through trains might have gone to Ealing Broadway, Wimbledon or Richmond. However, I suspect that they only went to Ealing Broadway. Does anyone know?

MalcolmStory21 (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shoeburyness railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply