Talk:Shawnee Smith
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article Quality
editPlease improve this article in any way you can. Ridethefire3211 16:19, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- After fixing the structure and spelling and removing some unencyclopedic parts, I've removed the message. Trevor Andersen 06:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Armageddon?
editDoes anyone have any information in what role she played in armegeddon?
She played the gal that Rockhound (Buscemi) is talking to in the bar when the Feds collect him to take him to NASA. The gal with the fake diamond ring.
She appears a lot, interestingly, opposite Steve Buscemi in films. At least three I think.
Married... with Children
edit"she played a tease who was either a friend of the blonde girl or else"?
What does this mean? I know what all of the words mean by themselves, but together, in this sequence, it makes little sense unless a person has actually seen the episode of Married... with Children in question.
There is no listing of her being on Married via IMDB or her own site. Why is she credited for this show?
Image copyright problem with File:Saw poster.JPG
editThe image File:Saw poster.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Filmography table
editWho keeps editing back the filmography (film and television) tables I am fixing? Lumping together the projects by year instead of having the year listed multiple times is neater and looks more professional. Having the year 1997 listed like 4 times looks tacky. Whoever is editing it back should stop because I'll keep re-editing it. It seriously looks better Dr.finkelstein09 (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- It has to do with WP:ACCESSIBILITY. In order to have sortable tables you have to eliminate the rowspan. Also all the old code is a bunch of unnecessary HTML markup. I've asked someone with more of a technical background to come by and explain it. Mike Allen 00:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Dr.finkelstein09, Mike's right about this and there's been a lot of discussion about this, so please drop this. This is the best practice that's been worked-out after months of discussion. It's about structure, accessibility, and usability. I'm rushed at the moment, but will check back here in a day or so. Cheers, Jack Merridew 01:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, fine. It looks cluttered and repetitive. Is there a way to do what the rowspan achieves in the new Wiki codes you are referring to? Dr.finkelstein09 (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- By adding
rowspan
along with sortable cells, it makes the table look like this when someone tries to 'sort'. Mike Allen 06:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)- I agree, the sortable version is better. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- By adding
- Alright, fine. It looks cluttered and repetitive. Is there a way to do what the rowspan achieves in the new Wiki codes you are referring to? Dr.finkelstein09 (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- The root issue with "rowspan" is that it amounts to "omit data". That's where other domains, such as accessibility and sortability, have trouble; they depend on the actual data, and fail when some of it's not there. Data tables should contain a full set of whatever data, without omissions. Jack Merridew 22:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
"The Jay Leno Show"!
editHello! I had to cull my DVR and one thing I had to delete was an installment of "The Jay Leno Show" as opposed to "The Tonight Show". I didn't want to do that, because Shawnee was in it as herself, albeit by accident! But anyway, my point is, even though she was a famous guest by accident, shouldn't it count in her list of TV appearances? Otherwise, I can't recall her ever being on a talk show, even on purpose. The incident happened when Jay Leno went to videotape some comedy skit bits at a nearby apartment block and/or neighborhood of houses on a block in Burbank. When she opened the front door, she recognized Jay and greeted him like a friend, but he didn't remember her at all, not even to his chagrin. (Or so it appeared to me.) She had to remind Jay who she was and how and when they had met before. Ever since then, I've wondered if Jay accidently revealing where she lived affected her sense of security and her actual security. Now I'd read before that her home had a personalized music studio in it and so I thought she had a big home like it seems that most celebrities have. However on Jay's show, her home looked to be very cramped! But I don't see anything about her having stalker problems because of that, so that's a relief. If I hadn't deleted the menu data about that episode I could write about when it aired here. Well, anyway I think that incidental, unintentional, accidental, funny appearance on "The Jay Leno Show" had/has merit enough to be listed in the article or mentioned somewhere. So does anyone else agree? How about it guys and gals?! By the way, out of everything she's been in, I think Jay could only remember the "Saw" movies. LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 06:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Here it is. Who knows it could be all an act. —Mike Allen 07:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- It was a pre-taped segment. If Shawnee Smith was concerned about her home being shown on television, she could have cut the segment off and told Jay not to air it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shawnee Smith/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Hey, I recently created a fansite on Shawnee Smith and was wonderinh about how I could get it linked here? The site is: http://shawnee.fansource.org/index.php |
Last edited at 06:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shawnee Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120907010343/http://www.officialsawnews.com/ to http://www.officialsawnews.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716021937/http://www.demonfm.co.uk/?q=node%2F631 to http://www.demonfm.co.uk/?q=node%2F631
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)