This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There seems to be a dispute regarding what content is appropriate for an encyclopedia article. For example, I do not think "Acheivements that make her STAND OUT" is the appropriate tone. Neither is a lengthy list of "testimonials" based solely on the subject's own website appropriate. The mere fact of being on cover pages is not significant enough to be mentioned in an encyclopedia article either. If there is a reliable source discussing Mohan's role as a photo model that makes the front pages, please provide that source and summarize what it says about her. The way it was, the article looked like promotional spam. None of what I removed was based on reliable sources that were independent of the subject (or I rewrote it as running text instead of as part of a table, keeping the source - running text is preferred). Snigdharsha, if you disagree, please point out which specific statements I removed that cited reliable third-party coverage. Huon (talk) 13:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
