Talk:Shadow Hearts: Covenant

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Abryn in topic GA Review
Good articleShadow Hearts: Covenant has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starShadow Hearts: Covenant is part of the Shadow Hearts series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 4, 2019Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadow Hearts Covenant.jpg edit

 

Image:Shadow Hearts Covenant.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:SH covenant.jpg edit

 

Image:SH covenant.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Axem Titanium (talk) 02:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Development Section edit

With the quotes around "leaked" it appears that the article is claiming that the leak could have been staged. Should get some outside references to support this, or remove the quotes.74.67.17.22 (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Introduction edit

Sorry if I am going about this the wrong way. Is the information about about Shadow Hearts: Covenant being set six months after the first game correct? From what I understand the first game started in 1913 and ended soon after. In 1915 World War I started and six months after that is when Covenant takes place. This is from the game manual.Versado (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

No it's not correct. I'll edit it to be the correct date. Sake neko (talk) 08:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gameplay section edit

The gameplay section reads like a review. I think it is poor. DanTheShrew (talk) 07:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shadow Hearts: Covenant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • "Another key location is the Graveyard, a realm within protagonist Yuri Hyuga's soul." - Feels a bit repetitive to have the Graveyard explained twice.
  • Fixed some issues I found, please review the changes when you get the chance.
  • I noted a bit of repetition with the word "called" being used for multiple sentences in a row. Can you fix that up?
  • That said, the couple of notes I have aren't enough to halt it passing, just make sure to take them into consideration. Good job. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 18:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Reply