Talk:Setup (2011 film)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title
editIMBD references this movie has being called "Setup", not "Set Up". http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1748197/
Should it be moved or is this a mistake on IMDB's part? ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 12:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I think a week was long enough to wait for a response. Going ahead with the move. ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 13:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Terrible page....
editI know I could go ahead and edit the page to improve it, but right now the only thing I can think of is to delete all the text and replace it with something like "This is a film". Really, this is insanely poorly written drivel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.87.148 (talk) 18:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I deleted the plot section and some bot undid that. I've now taken some old "plot" text that actually reads like a human wrote it and put that there instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.87.148 (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
FFS guys and gals, I give up. Keep that rubbish text if you wish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.87.148 (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
The city they are showing is NOT Grand Rapids, MI. It is Detroit, MI. I know that church and the street Woodward. And the street they were shooting on when they did the heist! Geez! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.58.153 (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Have to agree. This reads like a Film Studies freshman's attempt at analyzing it. Entire sections dedicated to a series of subjective interpretations and conclusions regarding the film's meaning? Come on. This is pathetic. 174.251.129.71 (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)