Talk:Semmelweis University

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 82.68.94.86 in topic Encyclopedic tone

Ad copy

edit

Reads like ad copy, as if someone had copied a university brochure.

For example, there is nothing about the history of the institution. When was it renamed to Semmelweis university? There must have been a renaming, since it was founded in 1769 and Semmelweis was born in 1818. And he died in "medical disgrace", so it couldn't have been named after him in 1865 (his death), and not for years after. --jae (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quite so. It also reads like a translation from Hungarian by someone with reasonable command of English, but definitely not a native speaker.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Semmelweis University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Encyclopedic tone

edit

This article reads too much like an advertisement in my opinion and lacks wikipedia's encyclopedic tone Meszzy2 (talk) 04:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quite so. It also reads like a translation from Hungarian by someone with reasonable command of English, but definitely not a native speaker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 09:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply