Talk:Seeking a Sanctuary

Seventh-day Adventist Church Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

November 2010 changes edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have reverted most of the changes made during November 2010. Two editors disagreed on the changes, and I give the following reasons for replacing original content:

replaced reviews. There is no logical reason for removing reviews of the book, which are the primary basis of the article
replaced category about Adventist media
the claim the book takes a liberal Adventist perspective on theology is inaccurate and original research. It rather comes across as relatively neutral history
discussion of inerrancy is original research because it is highly interpretative, and draws sources together to make new claims
comment "Some authors have described it as the best book about the church..." replaced. This is simply a summary of many of the published reviews of the book. It is a neutral comment. This is a widely held view by experts.
replaced Adventist Forum meeting, as this is relevant, verifiable material
clarified sources for some points
inline external links - I have kept this change, not reverting it, but moved them to the "External links" section

Colin MacLaurin (talk) 04:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic