Talk:Scupi

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2001:9E8:A3F7:A300:5B9B:588E:BE6E:A053 in topic Crassus' army of 29- 28 BC?

Dardanian fix edit

There are sources on internet that say that Scupi was a Dardanian settlement that was turned into Roman colony. This is not confirmed by the archeological excavation in Scupi even though it is found as reference on internet. That internet reference is not verified by the archeologists and don't write it in the article. The archeologists only assume that Scupi was built over a camp of two Roman legions that was erected after the Macedonian-Roman wars.
In any case, the possibility that the Romans built a coloniae over an existing settlement without any sources and included local population is dismissed because of the coloniea title itself. The coloniea settlements were new settlements and inhabited only by Romans. If the Romans built a settlement with the local population they would have named it municipium as it is the case with Stobi. (Toci (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC))Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scupi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scupi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Crassus' army of 29- 28 BC? edit

The triumvir Crassus (which is linked here) was long dead at that time, and so was at least one of his sons. Perhaps his grandson ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Licinius_Crassus_(consul_30_BC) ) is meant here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:A3F7:A300:5B9B:588E:BE6E:A053 (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply