Talk:SpaceShip III
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | The contents of the Scaled Composites Tier Two page were merged into SpaceShip III. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | It is requested that a vehicle diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
No longer speculative
editI didn't read the whole history of the page so I presume it was at one point a valid tag, but at this point the article has been reduced to two statements based on comments by the company itself and both are sourced. Neither of the statements go beyond the basic facts from the sources. aremisasling (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Move (2010)
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was already moved. --RegentsPark (talk) 02:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC) I think we should move this page to SpaceShipThree, since Scaled Composites SpaceShipOne redirects to SpaceShipOne and Scaled Composites SpaceShipTwo redirects to SpaceShipTwo. Zelmerszoetrop (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 30 March 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
SpaceShipThree → SpaceShip III – In light of Virgin Galactic's recent unveiling of the SpaceShip III spacecraft class, it seems a number of reliable sources (WP:RS) in both aerospace and tech news sources such as SpaceNews, collectSPACE, and The Verge, along with mainstream media outlets such as MSN, CNBC, CBS News, and Yahoo!, have have pretty much adopted the name with the three printed in roman numerals – "SpaceShip III" or "Spaceship III" – for the subject of this article. (WP:COMMONNAME) — Molly Brown (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good, lets do it.--Jrcraft Yt (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Move: Makes sense to follow the naming scheme which is used to report on the type. Terasail[✉] 01:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Also for moving to SpaceShip III, with redirection. 212.186.15.63 (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agree move with redirection. crandles (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)