Talk:Samsung Galaxy S7

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (the Samsung Galaxy S7 is scheduled to be released next week, and TechRadar stated that "We've always been pretty sure the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge was on the way – and now there's absolutely no doubt in our minds, as Samsung itself has mentioned the phone on one of its own websites") --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

For future reference, you should work on pre-released articles in the draft space and then move (or in this case, request it to be moved by a sysop) once it has been released. Jolly Ω Janner 20:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 15 February 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as obvious (non-admin closure). sst✈^(conjugate) 09:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

---

Samsung galaxy s7 → Samsung Galaxy S7 – Capitalization Jax 0677 (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

• Support - WP:COMMONNAME. RS use capital "S". Meatsgains (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

• It's fairly obvious that this should be moved. If this article isn't speedily deleted, list at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests. Jolly Ω Janner 03:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --216.56.69.34 (talk) 20:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC) It is a real product that has a lot of coverage.

Contested deletion

Not just leaks anymore, Samsung accidentally revealed it. --ViperSnake151  Talk  05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

This is the definition of a leak... "Leaked Galaxy S7 video shows off waterproofing and wireless charging" Jolly Ω Janner 05:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

It's not a leak if it's done by the company itself. More like a broken street date, premature posting. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Disputing the ref

The reference used (from The Verge which itself cites Gizmodo.com) both identifies the phone in the Indonesian commercial as the Galaxy S7. But, every other source that I've viewed states the commercial shows the S7 Edge (a closely related, but slightly different phone). Looking at the commercial itself, I tend to agree with the other sources - the phone clearly shows the curved sides that are a defining characteristic of the Edge variants from the Galaxy line in the past. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

I just noticed, the Gizmodo site then cites its source as being phone-probe.com[1] - that site identifies the phone being used in the commercial as the S7 Edge ... it looks like Gizmodo and The Verge then simplified the description from that source to just calling it the S7. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

I've updated the article to use the original source, and the description it provided (ie: S7 Edge). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Seperate or single article

For the S6 series, the S6 and the S6 Edge were in a single article; while the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ had its own article.

For the S7 series, should the S7 and S7 Edge again be in a single article? I'm thinking we will probably wait until after the official launch to make the final call on this, but wanted to bring up the question now to get the discussion started. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

• The S6 and the S6 Edge are in a single article because they were unveiled at the same time and had broadly similar specifications, while the S6 Edge+ was unveiled several months later, together with the Note 5. sst✈^(conjugate) 12:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2016

Can somebody add the Start date and age template from the current {Start date|2016|3|11} to {start date and age|2016|3|11} to correspond to Samsung Galaxy S7's official release date?

Since the Samsung Galaxy S6 and Samsung Galaxy S5 do. 173.73.242.76 (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Done clpo13_(talk) 19:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Network unlock code

I want the network unlock code for my samsung s6 edge — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.223.117.73 (talk) 00:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)