Talk:Salzburg (federal state)
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ranking edit
Read this article for the first time today and it struck me that the bits that say "ranked 6th" etc in the info box are out of context so not at all clear. I'm guessing that this means "6th" out of all Austrian states in terms of population etc? It doesn't say what the ranking is of. Just a thought, as I spend a lot of time in wiki and this really was not clear BuzzWoof (talk) 13:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Arrangement of towns and districts in the gazetteer edit
Would it be better to list the towns and cities by District (Bezirke), i.e. list each District and then list the towns within it? It would be less convenient for those searching alphabetically, but then only a tiny handful of the towns have their own articles anyway (this might be different in German Wikipedia). You might also have a better idea of what each District looks like. —— Shakescene (talk) 01:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 17 July 2016 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Salzburg (state) → State of Salzburg – per WP:NATURALDIS. Ebonelm (talk) 20:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose because it's not natural. English sources do not generally use the phrasing "State of X" for any Austrian states. Check the article's sources and links among others. — AjaxSmack 01:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per AjaxSmack and consistency with other states, such as Washington (U.S. state) and Georgia (U.S. state). ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 19:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The proposed form misleads the reader into thinking that it is common or official, when it is not. H. Humbert (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Salzburg (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090312043941/http://www.salzburg.gv.at/en/en-index/en-geschichtesbg/en-1816.htm to http://www.salzburg.gv.at/en/en-index/en-geschichtesbg/en-1816.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050710081207/http://www.land-sbg.gv.at/ to http://www.land-sbg.gv.at/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)