Talk:Salyut 3

April 2007

Why does the Cosmos 557 article redirect to Salyut 3? They are not the same spacecraft. Something should be done to correct this. Andy120290 00:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

This has been fixed. Mlm42 (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Shooting down a satellite?

According to this Encyclopedia Astronautica page, following test firings "Cosmonauts have confirmed that a target satellite was destroyed in the test." For some reason I highly doubt that.. especially since it sounds like the firings took place after the last cosmonaut visited the station.. so how could they have "confirmed" this? I haven't found any other source that claims a satellite was shot down, I think it's a bit dubious, so I haven't included it in the article. Mlm42 (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Salyut 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130000515/http://astronautix.com/flights/soyuz15.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/flights/soyuz15.htm
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5il9QixAg?url=http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf to http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salyut 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090822031202/http://www.astronautix.com/flights/soyuz14.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/flights/soyuz14.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Unmanned should be deprecated

It's past time that instances of the word "unmanned" be replaced with the generally accepted uncrewed or more colloquially crewless. I haven't made the edit because I'd like to raise the issue first. Official NASA usage these days is uncrewed, not sure what Roscosmos prefers these days. In any event Russia sent women into space first so it seems a no-brainer to me Vcpmartin (talk) 13:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

@Vcpmartin: Check out MOS:GNL. Our manual of style already calls for gender-neutral phrasing, at least for space programs. gobonobo ^{+ c} 19:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

thanks yes I forgot that was spelled out in the MOS. Anyway I see that someone else has made the change which I thoroughly endorse Vcpmartin (talk) 03:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)