Talk:Salem-Keizer Volcanoes

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Incorrect Redirect?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why does Salem-Keizer redirect here instead of the Salem-Keizer Metropolitan area? Ryoga-2003 (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you check the edit history of Salem-Keizer, you'll see that someone originally started the article about the Volcanoes there. I think the redirect would be be better as a disambiguation page, since "Salem-Keizer" can refer to both the team and the metro. Katr67 (talk) 00:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations desperately needed

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has three verifiable citations to reference material. Nearly the entire article is without support and justification rendering it pointless to be here. This is an appeal to those looking after this page to list some sources in support of the facts contained within it. It is a waste of a decent and attractive article without them. Even if you post a source causing a CS: error, or incomplete, please post them anyway and someone will come along an improve them, I promise. Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 05:08, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic