Talk:SMS Pommerania

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Pommerania/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

• She also received four 3.7 cm (1.5 in) Hotchkiss revolver cannon in 1880 British plural form of the word cannon.
  • I don't know that that's specifically British.

• Damnit, I forgot that cannon could be American too.

• She left Kiel in mid-June 1871 for the first research trip Maybe link Kiel.
  • Good catch
• training squadron. The ships were sent to Salonika Was this the official name of the city? Because the Thessaloniki article says that "Salonika" was written with a "c" and not a "k".
  • It's an accepted spelling in English - see Thessaloniki#Names_and_etymology.
• she proceeded to Wilhelmshaven and then back through the Skagerrak Link Wilhelmshaven.
  • Done
• and Skagerrak to Bergen, Norway. She then steamed south across Norway was part of the Union Sweden and Norway so maybe pipe it to it?
  • Done
• She was sold in 1892 to a Hamburg-based company Link Hamburg.
  • Done
• the ship was operated by the firm Paulsen & Ivers Is there a link to the firm Paulsen & Ivers?
  • No, not that I'm aware of.
• but was lost with all hands on her first voyage as a merchant ship on 20 January 1894 Remove the "on 20" with "in".
  • Done
• No edit wars.

Infobox

• No tonnes?
  • Good catch
• No length of the long at the waterline?
  • I usually only do the overall length in the box
• Link knots.
  • Done
• Maybe add her renamed name in the infobox and the date or isn't that necessary?
  • Added.

Images

• You have a great picture, hopefully, they'd become an FP. I can imagine that they'd be gorgeous.
  • Unfortunately, it chops off the front of the ship, but it's all I've been able to find.

Sources

• Looks good to me.
• No OR.
• The sources are reliable and academic.

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks yet again! Parsecboy (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

• Looks good to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)