Talk:SMS Blitz (1862)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review
Good articleSMS Blitz (1862) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSMS Blitz (1862) is part of the Camäleon-class gunboats series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 28, 2017Good article nomineeListed
October 24, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Blitz (1862)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


This article is in good shape. I have a few comments/queries:

  • the body says two marine steam engines but the infobox says one?
    • Fixed as per the Basilisk review
  • were the guns muzzle-loaders? If so, perhaps say so. Forgive my lack of naval artillery knowledge.
    • Ditto
  • when was her 15 cm gun replaced after being removed for the Black Sea trip?
    • See my response at the Basilisk review
  • perhaps link Commodore, also, the German versions of ranks are used elsewhere, perhaps the German spelling should be used for consistency?
    • Good idea - have done the same at Basilisk
  • perhaps mention that Cuxhaven is at the mouth of the Elbe?
    • Done
  • "Upon reaching Wilhelmshaven"
    • Good catch
  • the image is appropriately licensed.

That's me done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply