This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion
According to the MIT article previously cited [1], the reactor has a thermal output of 220MW and a shaft power output of 57000shp. However, an article from Global Security [2] states that the S6W has a thermal output of 270MW and a shaft power output of 52000shp. Currently, I’ve continued to use the figures from the MIT article while adding the Global Security article’s information on the steam turbines and the natural circulation. Nevertheless, I would like some input on how to reconcile these two conflicting sources. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 12:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can't answer your question, but are those numbers correct? They imply a thermal efficiency of only 26%, which seems very low for a steam turbine power plant. GA-RT-22 (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Low efficiency seems to be a trend among naval reactors (like the S9G, A1B, S6G), which I also find quite odd. My best guess is that either significant amounts of power are diverted to electric generation which might not be included in shaft power, or the heat transfer in the steam generator between the reactor coolant and the secondary coolant (the water that actually goes into the turbines) isn't very efficient. Liu1126 (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was just made aware that there was a RFC on globalsecurity.org before that decided it was a generally unreliable source. In this case, it would be best to go with the MIT article, so I’ll keep it as it is. Liu1126 (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply