Talk:Rudderow-class destroyer escort
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rudderow-class destroyer escort article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | USS Weeks (DE-285) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 07 June 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rudderow-class destroyer escort. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
recomisssioned edit
i know an officer that served on the uss delong it was recomissioned during the cuban missle crises.Jesgreenleaf 11:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Cancelled units edit
There's a number of ships that were ordered as members of this class but which were cancelled before completion, that have links pointing here (at least one, USS Weeks DE-285, from a AfD result), but the table only mentions completed ships. This should probably be rectified at some point? - The Bushranger One ping only 01:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
So why is one shown as preserved in the table with the statistics for the class as a whole... edit
When the list at the bottom of the article showing each individual ship that was completed shows that each was either scrapped or scuttled as a target.
Can't have it both ways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:a645:2100:68b0:a887:a5db:349c (talk) 04:24, 5 March 2018
Error found and fixed! Numech (talk) 16:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)