Talk:Royal Cache

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dates edit

Can any dates be added? When was it discovered? (1881?)

Charles Wilbour edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article neglects to credit Charles Wilbour's important contribution in finding/securing the tomb. It was Wilbour who identified the villains after numerous attempts to get them to 'come clean.' Good thing too, because soon after the clearing of the tomb, major parts of it collapsed (because of the friability of the rock, it is always at risk of further collapse). The standard Egyptology narration, in variance with the facts, always over-credits Maspero, denigrates Brughsch, apologizes for the Rasuls (even credits them; after all the cave is now named after them!) and completely ignores Wilbour. Curious considering this find is as important, if not more important than the tomb of Tut. I guess Egyptology is still, to this day, a messy and political endeavour. Some fully credentialed Egyptologists actually cite the movie, "The Night of Counting the Years" (an avowed piece of fiction) as a source. For shame! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.33.53 (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Where now? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

So where are its former inhabitants now? 141.243.112.20 (talk) 01:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Immediately after the discovery they were shipped to the main [Egyptian Museum] in Cairo, where most of them still reside, in the "Royal Mummies" room which has been recently restored.

This article could really do with an overhaul -- the story behind the find of the cache is fascinating, and is the subject of several books. Captmondo (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Citations in the text are there, but they are not yet hyperlinked. I moved them from Bibliography to References. Y-barton (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DB320. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Respect for the dead edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The addition of photographs does not enhance the article imo. In my own culture it is considered by many people as gross desecration. Surely the article can be read without such images? Anyone who wants to see them can be directed to the media section of wikipedia. Would anyone object to their removal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.199.3.206 (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

As no objections raised I have made the change. Thank you. 92.40.194.39 (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

92.40.194.39 You already tried at least twice on Ahmose-Nefertari. Once again, Wikipedia is not censored. Your complaints are no more valid than those of those who do not want to see depictions of Muhammad on his page. Just give up. Lone-078 (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic