Talk:Ronnie Screwvala

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with RSVP Movies

File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article should be deleted/revised. edit

Hi, this article should be deleted or at least revised to make the style more suitable for an encyclopedia. If you look at the headers for the division and the general way this page (especially the first few sentences) are written, you'll see that this is quite uncyclopedic and reads almost like an advertisement. MarkIrkutsk (talk) 04:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Scattered copyright violations edit

Add to the list of blatantly promotional edits by Yogeshdube (talk · contribs) recent additions that include content copied from Business Today [1]. So, I've templated the article to reflect this. 99.136.255.134 (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with RSVP Movies edit

The company fails WP:NCORP and should be merged with the article about its founder. Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Support merger per nominator's rationale. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - definitely makes more sense to have it combined. Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - per nom. Interestingly the discussion still existing since August 2019. Abishe (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Opppose merge; active film production company producing films. I admit that many of the references are about the films rather than the company (mentions in passing), but some (focussing on the role of the company in supporting emerging directors) have enough company content to warrant independent treatment. Klbrain (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply