Talk:Roger W. Moss Jr.
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Back off, Toasty. I'm getting a little cranky. --Mothperson 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
What is this "(preservationists)" crap, and "alleged"'s??? Suddenly it's a crime to be a well-known? Or to be called well-known when one is but the person using the word "alleged" doesn't like you? Or to be called a well-known preservationist when one actually is, but a person exists in the world who doesn't agree with one's beliefs? Jeezum crow, Toasty. Why don't you go make trouble in the all-so-important world of Wikipedia articles on New York television news - boy, there's a significant topic, or license plate collections, or the Jackie Gleason Bus Stop and give this one up, because YOU. WILL. NOT. WIN. HERE. I PROMISE. Go rewrite that ghastly stub about Frank Field (meteorologist) ("I think he's a medical doctor"). You've got soooo many stubs that need work. Get busy. Lazy lazy socks. Haven't read one substantive thing by you yet. --Mothperson 20:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Bloody Americans! edit
I go look up Roger Moss and I find a bloody American! This whole thing is getting to damn Ameri-centric. I look at the history and I see that there was a page that gave an option for the American and the Welsh sculptor and it was removed. Typical American nonsense they thing they can control everything. Some bloody international encylopedia! Ameri-CentricPatrol 30 June 2005 13:29 (UTC)
- Those who don't read article history are condemned to - uh, I guess have apoplexy. --Mothperson 30 June 2005 13:51 (UTC)
POV - This gentelman seems to be rather disputed edit
This gentelman seems to be cause of great dispute, and the article seems to be slanted more in favour of Mr. Moss. Frühstücksdienst 19:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)