Talk:Roger Marshall
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 6 October 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roger Marshall article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 6 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Roger Marshall (politician) to Roger Marshall. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 6 October 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — MaterialWorks 13:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
– Clear primary topic by usage (96% of pageviews) and significance (US Senator). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support thought of nominating this myself, but was gonna hold off and see how some of the related RMs went. Though, it seems like they're all trending towards moves as ptopics, and this is no exception. estar8806 (talk) ★ 03:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Estar8806: Thought you might have; this is a pretty clear-cut one. Also thinking about Dan Sullivan, an article whose move/pageview history is kind of complicated; also a surprising number of people want the Eastenders character. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Hameltion The data is pretty convincingly in favor of the senator for that, only briefly did the Eastenders character outpace him, and not within the last year [1]. Even if a primary topic couldn't be argued based off of raw views (which I think the Senator barely wins), in my opinion real people inherently have more long-term significance than TV characters by the same name, with of course the rare exception. If you want to propose it, feel free. I'll support it, but I cannot say how many others would support it. estar8806 (talk) ★ 12:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Estar8806: Thought you might have; this is a pretty clear-cut one. Also thinking about Dan Sullivan, an article whose move/pageview history is kind of complicated; also a surprising number of people want the Eastenders character. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Doesn't seem likely many know of the screenwriter or cricketer these days. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Walt Yoder (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.