Talk:Robert Hertzberg

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Neutrality edit

This article does not seem to me entirely in keeping with Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines; specifically, it seems biased in favour of Hertzberg. The article contains a great deal of praise for him, proudly listing his accomlishments and priorities as a legislator, but doesn't seem to contain a word of criticism or negative comment about him. Perhaps there simply hasn't been any, but that seems unlikely... any politician who's had as long a career as he has must have attracted criticism from somebody. It should be added to the article, and some of the more hagiographic sections toned down or removed. Terraxos (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Intro too long edit

In addition to the previous, the introduction to this article is WAY too long. It's almost as if somebody couldn't wait to get all this information into the article, and had to front-load it. Balance, folks, balance; introduction, development of text, and sidelights. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:HertzbergandDad.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:HertzbergandDad.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HertzbergandDad.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:HertzbergandCarter.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:HertzbergandCarter.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HertzbergandCarter.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:HertzbergandCardoza.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:HertzbergandCardoza.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HertzbergandCardoza.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Hertzberg for Mayor.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Hertzberg for Mayor.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hertzberg for Mayor.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Hertzberg with Arnold.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Hertzberg with Arnold.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hertzberg with Arnold.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

User removing referenced content without comment. edit

2602:306:cd48:e90:f472:3b13:a4fb:deac (talk)‎ has been removing referenced material without comment and causing problems with named references. I plan to revert the article to its 11 October 2013 version as the easiest way to take care of this. New material should be added back in using Wikipedia references: <ref>...</ref>, not numbers like [54]. Be sure to include an edit summary. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Hertzberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply