Talk:Reliable Sources

Add topic
Active discussions


The end of the first paragraph needs to be rewritten, as the text references Howard Kurtz by last name only without prior mention. Apace361 (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


Is a reliable site? The paid staff must approve any reviews published, so wouldn't those reviews count as reliable sources? The Wikipedia article for them at Sputnikmusic#Reviewer_stratification says Contributing Reviewers "are acknowledged as being good writers who generate content of a high quality." They don't just let anyone submit something. Whether you are paid as a writer, or volunteer, that shouldn't matter. A paid editorial staff still approves everything and these are professionally written reviews. Dream Focus 23:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

This article is aout the CNN program "Reliable Sources." I think you may have been thinking about Wikipedia's reliable sources noticeboard: try putting your question there: WP:RSN. Drrll (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Whoops! How'd I mess that up? Sorry, ignore that then. Dream Focus 01:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)