Talk:Realm of the Mad God

File:Build105.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Build105.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). Hi, Dthnider here. I was just told that my "change" was undone, and it was a change that I never done. It was probably my brother, whatever, just please don't ban me for it or anything. The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Build105.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Already fixed it, so its fine. Dream Focus 00:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Video Game Portal

Can we have Realm upgraded from stub level on the Video Game Portal??? I don't think it qualifies as that anymore. Also, it now has a an info box and a logo. Shaun9876 (talk) 18:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Article needs a lot of work, but it's above a stub. Lot of gamecruft and second person pronouns, and low on references. Target those areas, especially manual of style and references, as you improve the article further. Don't be afraid to cut inappropriate content that falls under gamecruft just because it would shorten the article. Being long doesn't make an article good. -- ferret (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Just an additional thought, but adding information such as control schemes definitely falls under gamecruft. Please give a read at WP:Gamecruft and consider how the article can be rewritten if it's to become a C Class. -- ferret (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I've removed some of the more obvious gamecruft and rewritten several sections to remove second person pronouns. Article still needs a lot of work. -- ferret (talk) 03:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^{Talk Email} 18:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

ferret I have a question. Would discussing the types of bags that correspond to different types of loot help the article? ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^{Talk Email} 19:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Shaun, that would probably be too gamecrufty. The article should contain general information that is helpful for someone to understand what the game is about, but should not include the kinds of details you might find in a game guide or, for example, at a site like Gamefaqs, where detailed walkthroughs can be found. Wikipedia isn't meant to explain how to play the game, but to explain WHAT the game itself is and why it's important or notable to the reader. -- ferret (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Realm of the mad god Pirate Cave.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Realm of the mad god Pirate Cave.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 22 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Realm of the mad god Pirate Cave.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Two things

Hey, this might, maybe fall under WP:RPG .

Also, I may update the title picture as it has changed since when I took the picture (Build 105)

Good Day, ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^{Talk Email} 00:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Assessment

As of right now, this article remains with a Start class rating. The main reason is the fact that it is missing important sections a video game article needs to be rated higher (Development primarily). Also, there needs to be an expansion to the Reception section, like adding quotes from reviews and what the reviewers gave as a rating. And finally, it needs more references. Five references is just not enough. GamerPro64 16:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

At first, I thought this was written today, since it's almost exactly what I was going to write. The article can't be assessed as C or better until it gets a lot more sources, adds a plot section, and gets bigger reception and development sections. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 00:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Gameplay section needs verifying.

I've been rewriting the development and reception sections with some general article maintenance. I've never actually played the game though so I can't verify how well the Gameplay section describes the game. It would be a massive help towards the quality of this article if someone who has played the game a fair amount could check through it to make sure all the important details are there. Samwalton9 (talk) 02:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

And possibly remove some details that are unimportant. Again, I'm not confident I know what is and isn't important. Samwalton9 (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll Take a crack at it §haun 9∞76 ^༆ 14:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Realm of the Mad God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511074111/https://forums.wildshadow.com/wiki/realm-mad-god/equipment to https://forums.wildshadow.com/wiki/realm-mad-god/equipment
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130508081458/https://forums.wildshadow.com/wiki/realm-mad-god/guilds to https://forums.wildshadow.com/wiki/realm-mad-god/guilds
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130412045805/https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/168517 to https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/168517
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130425081151/http://www.indiegamemag.com/realm-of-the-mad-god-hits-steam-2/ to http://www.indiegamemag.com/realm-of-the-mad-god-hits-steam-2/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514191943/https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/102356 to https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/102356
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130821232723/https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/213610 to https://forums.wildshadow.com/node/213610
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://community.kabam.com/forums/showthread.php?665607-Important-Update-about-Realm-of-the-Mad-God

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)