Talk:Rambles in Germany and Italy

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Awadewit in topic Quick comments
Featured articleRambles in Germany and Italy is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 13, 2014.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 21, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
January 30, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 5, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that British novelist Mary Shelley was blackmailed by the Italian exile for whom she wrote the travel narrative Rambles in Germany and Italy?
Current status: Featured article

"a country which memory painted as paradise" edit

Although Percy Shelley and two of their children died there, Italy became for Mary Shelley "a country which memory painted as paradise", as Shelley scholar Betty T. Bennett puts it.

Bennett gives this as a quote by Shelley from the work. She gives the reference "8:77", which I presume is to the eight-volume edition of the works. qp10qp (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oops - my note-taking system broke down! Fixed. Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 05:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

embarrassed edit

She was embarrassed by the entire incident: I think there are some good quotes in the letters to add colour to this. For example, she says somewhere something like "at my age, too". Ha ha. I love her in this incident: he clearly turned her right on, not to put too fine a point on it. The article mentions infatuation, but at first mention I think this might be made clearer. qp10qp (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do you know offhand if any of the biographies have any of the juicy quotes? Awadewit (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rambles in Germany and Italy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Your usual stellar job. I've made some very minor tweaks to reduce some redundancy, etc. In the section on the nationalist revolutions and the Carbonari, etc., I tweaked a little more than elsewhere--some of the text was misleading. Of course, I haven't read your sources for those, but I have read others, so let me know if I've stated something in a way that your sources did not, and I'll find you a citation. It should be okay. Fascinating subject, btw, and well done! I'll let you have the honors of putting the article in the proper lists. Enjoy!Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I was trying to simplify the Italian situation too much, I think! Awadewit (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

additional comments edit

You might also think about distinguishing between "revolutionary" and "nationalist"... That distinction is not clear in this article, but if you're going to FA it probably should be. Also, the participation of the French in Italian national aspirations is complicated. I'd say that you should either simplify it a LOT more, or explain it a lot more. It might be possible to refer only to the guy as as Italian nationalist, and that she wanted to help him, and leave it at that. Depends on whether you think the history of risorgimento is important for your article. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quick comments edit

I've added some, but linking seems rather light, though Unification of Italy has 3. Catholicism linked way down, but C church in lede not. Ideally map should use Trier not Treves, & Kissingen should have its Bad. John Murray only published the guidebook surely? Blue Guides are their descendents. "the travel writer Samuel Rogers" is not a balanced description of him. There were a number of engvar points, & I'm sure there are more, as I haven't read it closely. I changed a "released", but (especially C19th) books are published, appear or come out. There's an "issued" in the first sentence & I think they do other things elsewhere. Johnbod (talk) 20:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reading the article!
  • I've added more links.
  • A better map is currently in production, so we will make these changes to it.
  • Not sure what you mean about Murray.
  • Rogers is now described as "travel writer and poet".
  • As for WP:ENGVAR, I can only ask for help, as I did on your talk page. Awadewit (talk) 17:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply