Talk:Rambles in Germany and Italy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Your usual stellar job. I've made some very minor tweaks to reduce some redundancy, etc. In the section on the nationalist revolutions and the Carbonari, etc., I tweaked a little more than elsewhere--some of the text was misleading. Of course, I haven't read your sources for those, but I have read others, so let me know if I've stated something in a way that your sources did not, and I'll find you a citation. It should be okay. Fascinating subject, btw, and well done! I'll let you have the honors of putting the article in the proper lists. Enjoy!Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I was trying to simplify the Italian situation too much, I think! Awadewit (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)