Talk:Ram in a Thicket

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Maproom in topic "Ram caught in a thicket"

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ram in a Thicket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

meaning? edit

please also report on speculations about the meaning of the figure...?! ...besides the faint hint that it might have been a sacrificial animal ('artificial' biblical title...)... thanx! --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Ram caught in a thicket" edit

I see that "Ram caught in a thicket" redirects here. I think that is a mistake. For me, and I suspect for many English-speakers in Christian countries around the world, that phrase refers to an incident in the Book of Genesis chapter 22 in which God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son, as described in Wikipedia in the article Binding of Isaac. I would like to replace the redirect by a disambiguation page for "Ram caught in a thicket", linking both here and to Binding of Isaac.

Your opinions? Maproom (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree, especially since the name "Ram caught in a thicket" for this sculpture is inspired by the story in Genesis (and is clearly a bit of a misnomer, since this is a sculpture of a goat and isn't "caught", but that's neither here nor there). Furius (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Agree entirely. Just do it. Johnbod (talk) 00:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Done. Thanks. Maproom (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply