Talk:RAF Wickenby
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
edit- Merge with Wickenby Aerodrome, it doesn't matter what the final article is titled, though i prefer RAF Wickenby as that has by far the greatest amount on info.Petebutt (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Support - Merge Wickenby Aerodrome into this article. Gavbadger (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose the aerodrome article could be expanded with information regarding the history of the site, airshow and the museum would increase the length to an acceptable standard as C or B class on the WikiProject Military history quality scale . Gavbadger (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on RAF Wickenby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140308162941/http://www.12sqn.net/wickenby/pub.html to http://www.12sqn.net/wickenby/pub.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)