Talk:Rütger Wever

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Pseudoscience source removed

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

In January 2010, Firstenberg filed a lawsuit against his neighbor, seeking damages of $530,000,^[1] for "refusing to turn off her cell phone and other electronic devices."^[2] He claimed that because of shared wiring, electromagnetic fields from his neighbor's electronic devices were keeping him up at night and destroying his health.^[1]

Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

At https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%22schumann+resonance%22 there isn't much to go by. I suspect there isn't any WP:MEDRS-quality source among them. Also the link between Wever and Schumann resonances is extremely tenuous, since it appears only in WP:FRINGE/PS sources. I could find no reliable source for such claim. While Wever did write about a 10 Hz electric field (not: electromagnetic), the link with the Schumann resonances is original research. The OR claim conflates between electromagnetic and electric fields, conflates between 7.83, 14.3, 20.8, 27.3 and 33.8 Hz, on one side, and 10 Hz, on the other. So, besides being unverifiable, it is a far-fetched claim. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Quoting myself. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

^ ^a ^b Ray, Bill (January 11, 2010), "Santa Fe man demands half a mill for being near iPhone", The Register
^ Sharpe, Tom (January 7, 2010), "Wi-Fi foe sues neighbor for using electronics", The New Mexican

Add topic

[register2010-1] Ray, Bill (January 11, 2010), "Santa Fe man demands half a mill for being near iPhone", The Register

[newmexican2010-2] Sharpe, Tom (January 7, 2010), "Wi-Fi foe sues neighbor for using electronics", The New Mexican

[1]

[2]