Talk:Queers Read This
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | Queers Read This is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) at 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: 1990 essay about queer identity |
 | A fact from Queers Read This appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that roughly 15,000 copies of the anonymously published essay "Queers Read This" were distributed at the June 1990 New York Gay Pride Parade?
- ALT1: ... that Queer Nation, a group focused on combating violence against LGBT people through direct action, established its reputation by distributing the anonymously published essay "Queers Read This"?
- Reviewed: Mr. Ratburn and the Special Someone
Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
A solid article about an interesting topic. Either hook would work; personally I think the first one is more interesting. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)