Talk:Pukguksong-2

Korea Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Korean

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force

TEL vehicle?

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What's the source for the new image of the tracked TEL, and are we sure that this is the same missile?

The first Pukguksong-2 test video used a wheeled TEL, not this one. The later test doesn't have the TEL visible (AFAICS), but the missile does look longer than this vehicle. What's the evidence for this vehicle being the one? Andy Dingley (talk) 14:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic