Talk:Ptichka
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ptichka article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 11 April 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ptichka → OK-1.02
- 2.01 (Buran-class spacecraft) → OK-2.01
- 2.02 (Buran-class spacecraft) → OK-2.02
- 2.03 (Buran-class spacecraft) → OK-2.03
– The RM of 19 March 2020 is a mess. Instead, I suggest a clear and unparenthetical article title (see above) based on the English translation of Russian: орбитальный корабль, romanized: orbital'nyy korabl'. Although there may have fears of being overlapped with the OV-xxx nomenclature of the Space Shuttle, they hardly will be, especially for the Orbital Vehicle 2.xx series. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 16:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 20:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 19:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Why are you still trying to rename it to English names? The name is not "Shuttle" or "Orbital Vehicle". It is same as on the Russian site Space Shuttle, it is ru:Спейс шаттл and not "Kосмический челнок". OK-1K2 looks much better, as you changed it almost at the end of the discussion. Jirka.h23 (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment – Now, I suggest a nomenclature used by Astronautix. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 13:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unofficial names that are memorable, used, pronouncable, “little bird”, are better than jargon/code names. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.