This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I created this article a few days ago and it was immediately deleted on the grounds that it constituted "advertising for a product". This game is 20 years old and no longer being sold, at least outside of Ebay. Is there some legal issue with the use of the word "professional" in the title? I know the game was released in the U.S. with a different title, maybe for that reason. 2fort5r (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I suspect the problem is more in the tone of the article, which reads like advertising copy off the back of the box. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I took a stab at improving the tone, and I've added an image to the infobox. I don't think it would qualify for speedy deletion at this point. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for the help. 2fort5r (talk) 01:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
