Talk:Prošek

Prosecco

The article is clearly written by a Croatian, includes Croatian sources and it is by nature biased. This wine is clearly Italian Prosecco which is a Made in Italy brand recognized by EU and by UNESCO altogether, the Croatian government is trying to pass it as a homemade Croatian product and I don't doubt it's more than 2000 years old, Prosecco is that old, Latin and Italian lands have always produced this kind of wine, first called Pucinum, which is indeed typical of the Triestine gulf, Istria and Dalmazia. As always Croatians are trying to take what's not theirs. They did it with lands, they do it with historical figures and with products as well. I think the article should be to be taken down or incorporated with the already existing Prosecco page since it's pretty much a stub and the only cited source is in Croatian.

==

  Wow, do you really think that normal people wouldn't think you're insane when reading your text? And then you have the audacity to ask for the article to be taken down?! You're just a typical Italian revisionist that doesn't realize that Istra is Croatian and Faust Vrančić(Fausto Veranzio) is as well. Romans weren't made up of just Italians and many Croatian scholars from Dalmatia gave themselves Italian names to signify how much respect they had for scholars from Italy. Instead of taking pride in historical correspondence between Italians and Croatians (Mussolini's fascists aside), you attack and disparage without providing any evidence.

And to make your comment even funnier, the names Prosecco and Prošek, although similar, do not share the same spelling or pronunciation and refer to two different products. These two drinks differ in color, taste, grape varieties, method and region of production and prices. Prosecco is served at the beginning of the meal, while prosecco as a dessert wine is served at the end of the meal, so they are not and cannot be market competitors. Get your butthurt a** out of here man lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.198.230 (talk) 23:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

The pathetic level of revisionism by Croatians, thinking that Istria is native Croatian land or that Croatians had anything to do with Romans when they migrated into the Julian-Istrian-Dalmatian coast only from VII century onwards.

I reiterate my demand to incorporate the article with Prosecco and I once again remind that the article is merely a stub and its only sources listed are in Croatian, there's only so little you can write about a Croatian copy afterall. 93.36.216.197 (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)