Talk:Priscilla Rattazzi
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Cleanup templates on article edit
Greetings all,
I created this article yesterday and found today that the neutrality has been disputed and that I have not properly used copryrighted material.
Any sense of a lack of neutrality in this article is simply error in my writing style that I am happy to edit and all reference formats that I used were taken by looking at how other pages are built.
I am happy to make any necessary changes to adhere to the proper rules of Wikipedia. Any help from someone with more Wikipedia experience would be greatly appreciated. I am still learning how to do all of this properly and I would like to know how to remove the warnings from the top of the page.
Again I am happy to make any changes and I am sorry for all the trouble.
BIG thank you to all of the Wiki community for all of the help that I have already received while learning the ropes.
Cheers,
Dunning22 (talk) 18:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, Perhaps you could ask User:Alexsoddy, who put the warnings there in the first place? Good luck, Lala m7 (talk) 17:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Btw, I do not believe it is acceptable so "cite" other wikipedia-articles in the references. Cheers, Lala m7 (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've done some more cleanup in the article (including adding some more reference citations) and removed all of the cleanup templates. I don't think they were valid when added, and they are less valid now. However, as Lala m7 noted, it is true that Wikipedia articles should not cite other Wikipedia articles as sources. --Orlady (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)