Talk:Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Gen. Quon in topic GA Review
Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions is part of the Millennium (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 27, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Millennium's "Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions" makes reference to Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 04:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Plot: "Watts contacts Black for help with the case. However, Black is still recovering from the murder of his friend Bob Bletcher" Is this in the present, or are we still in flashback mode?
- Plot: "...as evidence disappears or witnesses fail to identify him in a line-up..." I would change 'or' to 'and'
- Production: "...as well as directing..." -> "...as well as direct..."
- Reception: Maybe its just me, but although the DVD Talk review is sort of mixed, all the rest seem to be positive, so I'd change "mixed to positive" to "moderately positive" or something of the like
- References: Ref 14 has the wrong title attached to it
- References: Ref 15 has the wrong title attached to it
Those are the only issues (aside from the fact that I love the Oxford Comma and this title doesn't have one, but I digress) that I could find. On hold.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)