This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
1. Popchips is not a well known enough brand to deserve its own article on Wikipedia.
2. This reads like an advertisement for the brand instead of encylopedic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.110.31 (talk) 23:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
No reason to delete the article. Your first point, I'd say their recognition from Forbes argues against you as well as the fact that I can buy them at any major retailer in my state. I'm not prepared to argue your second point, but that point argues for a rewrite, not deletion. --71.205.234.192 (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is still a crappy article, but I found some more production info to reference. The proprietary "process" is a bit annoying to narrow down, since it seems more that the company simply does not want to reveal a standard process that has been applied to potato flour instead of rice flour. Still does read excessively as an advertisement, but tagged as such where appropriate. – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 05:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
3. Good as a general outline, more information needs to be added. I found a few minor spelling mistakes. The page layout and organization is good. The footnotes and citations are good. Overall I would rate this 7/10, just because not all the information from your other group members is in this article yet.Cylersarah31 (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Quaker Oats is making some very similar chips from rice, named "Popped" (formerly "Quakers Rice Snacks"). Should these be mentioned? Wikipedian192 (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}