This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Politics of the Socialist Republic of Croatia is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I created this article in order to consolidate detailed information about the political leadership of SR Croatia that was IMO improperly scattered around the history sections of various articles describing modern-day (not-so-)equivalent leadership.
While doing so, I consolidated the relatively scant references, which are mostly to primary sources - and even so, most of the factoids here are still not referenced, and goodness knows there's so many names and dates. I dropped the various tables of 3+ sets of officeholders in favor of a prose style, which added a bit of repetitive verbosity, but eliminated the egregious table formatting that was apparently not at all conducive to verifiability as evidenced by the lack of it during the many years this information remained online in that format.
I'm completely open to reformatting this article some other way, as long as we don't repeat the mistakes of a decade ago, documented in the talk page archives of the old articles, listed in the 'copied' tags above.
