Talk:Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 15, 2020Articles for deletionKept
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 2, 2022.

Top image edit

I don't think it would've been too much trouble, to seek consensus to change the top image, before making that change. GoodDay (talk) 22:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'd think that, after all this time, you'd understand WP:BOLD. If you have yet another objection, do please air it. -- MIESIANIACAL 23:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, restore the previous longstanding top image, if not the other images you've changed. Then seek a consensus for those 'images' you want added, here. GoodDay (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ignoring WP:BOLD doesn't make it go away. I also don't see any prior discussion on this matter where some consensus was reached.
Do you have a problem with any of the images there now? Do you have an argument as to why nothing but four UK images and two Australian ones is superior to three UK images, one Australian, one Canadian, and one New Zealand image? -- MIESIANIACAL 23:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
There was nothing wrong with the top image, that had Union Jacks in them, as the UK is where the Queen celebrated her jubilee. A more fitting change, would've been the royals on the Buckingham Palace balcony. GoodDay (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Buckingham Palace has nothing to do with the UK? You'll have to explain that one.
There're only so many images to choose from. The one at top there now shows not only Buck House, but the Party at the Palace, and the number 70 with a crown; much more jubilee-related than a bus. -- MIESIANIACAL 23:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'll leave it with Peter Ormond. Seeing as he's the one who's put the most time into this page. PS - Giving credit where it's due? Thankfully, you did use Buckingham Palace as the top image. GoodDay (talk) 23:43, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Too many sources clumped together edit

Where ten of the governors-general are mentioned in a paragraph, it ends with 10 back-to-back sources. If anyone knows how to? it would be best to have 'each' source after 'each' governor-general. In other parts of the page, we've other instances of clumped sources. GoodDay (talk) 04:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sub-sectioning, the External links section edit

If we'ere gonna 'sub-section' the External Links section. Do we really have to repeat "External link" in each sub-section heading? GoodDay (talk) 23:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate headers cause page navigation issues. -- MIESIANIACAL 00:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
We'd of been better off, not sub-heading at all. GoodDay (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I thought you didn't like seas of blue. -- MIESIANIACAL 00:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't, though I tolerate it more in 'external links' sections. Anyways, I think a solution has been found. GoodDay (talk) 01:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply