Talk:Personal life of Wilt Chamberlain
Latest comment: 9 years ago by DangerousJXD in topic Discussing merge
 | The contents of the Personal life of Wilt Chamberlain page were merged into Wilt Chamberlain and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge with Wilt Chamberlain article?
editWhy is this a separate page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.96.126 (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Cuz he slept with 20 000 chicks and he's a hero. 84.197.115.157 (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Do you really believe he had sex with 20,000 women. If you do, than you must be really gullible. Also, why does the article pretend that the claim is true? If you are going to give an honest critique than there should be sketicism. For this to be than Wilt would have had to had sex with 1.36 new women per day over the course of 40 years. He supposedly had sex with 20,000women, but there was never any paternity claims. Never any vindictive ex's who went public to expose him. He lived in Hollywood, but was rumored to be in relationships with any celebrity women. Where are the women who were part of Wilt's 20,000? Where are the stories? All you got is stories from people who didn't have sex with him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.88.186 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
This really makes no sense as a separate page. Personal life is by definition the main subject of any biography. Ian (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Done. Delete it.—DangerousJXD (talk) 10:16, 3 June 2015 (UTC)- For what it's worth, I agree. —DangerousJXD (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Discussing merge
editI created a new section for discussion because the above is messy. I have already said I think this article should be merged into Wilt Chamberlain. —DangerousJXD (talk) 06:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- I feel like we can move ahead with the merge given the good work you've done and considering the discussion has been open for some time above (albeit not constructively). Ian (talk) 03:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merged. Ian (talk) 04:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Wait I'm confused. Ian, what was put in the Wilt Chamberlain article that was here? I don't see anything in the Wilt Chamberlain edit history. Has it not been done yet?Disregard. —DangerousJXD (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merged. Ian (talk) 04:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)