Talk:Paramashiva (film)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 31 December 2020
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 31 December 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Paramashiva → Paramashiva (film) – Paramashiva should redirect to Parashiva, per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. The deity (under any of various spellings) is of far more encyclopedic primacy than an obscure film named after the religious figure. Disambiguation should be done with hatnotes, per WP:TWODABS. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Support, speedy per WP:ASTONISH In ictu oculi (talk) 09:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Agree with the others above and the rationale provided. The deity article is indeed one that the reader would be expecting and would be astonished with the film result. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nominator. I don't think anyone is going to contest this, so might as well apply WP:SNOWBALL. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.